Screener
RHRX vs DYTA
RH Tactical Rotation ETF vs SGI Dynamic Tactical ETF
Key differences
- DYTA costs 0.06% less per year.
- RHRX is classified as alternative, while DYTA is mixed asset — different risk/return profiles.
- RHRX follows a option income strategy; DYTA uses active selection.
- Over the last 3 years, RHRX has delivered higher annualized returns.
- RHRX has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| RHRX | DYTA | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 1.38% | 1.32% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $34M | $96M |
| Since | 2012 | 2023 |
| Dividend yield | 0.00% | 1.59% |
| Asset class | alternative | mixed asset |
| Region | north america | — |
| Strategy | option income | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +39.5% | +14.4% |
| CAGR 3Y | +22.4% | +11.7% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.09 | 0.74 |
| Volatility 1Y | 13.26% | 9.63% |
| Max drawdown | -25.33% | -9.41% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to RHRX and DYTA
Explore further