Skip to content
Beacon
Screener

RHRX vs QVOY

RH Tactical Rotation ETF vs Q3 All-Season Active Rotation ETF

RHRX

RH Tactical Rotation ETF

Adaptive ETF

Annual cost

1.38%

Fund size

$34M

QVOY

Q3 All-Season Active Rotation ETF

Q3 Asset Management Corporation

Annual cost

1.32%

Fund size

$60M

Key differences

  • QVOY costs 0.06% less per year.
  • RHRX is classified as alternative, while QVOY is mixed asset — different risk/return profiles.
  • RHRX follows a option income strategy; QVOY uses active selection.
  • Over the last 3 years, RHRX has delivered higher annualized returns.
  • RHRX has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.

Side-by-side comparison

RHRXQVOY
Annual cost (TER)1.38%1.32%
Fund size (AUM)$34M$60M
Since20122022
Dividend yield0.00%0.52%
Asset classalternativemixed asset
Regionnorth america
Strategyoption incomeactive selection
CAGR 1Y+39.5%+22.6%
CAGR 3Y+22.4%+12.0%
CAGR 5YN/AN/A
Sharpe 3Y1.090.58
Volatility 1Y13.26%17.44%
Max drawdown-25.33%-17.05%

Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.

Similar to RHRX and QVOY