Screener
RHTX vs GAL
RH Tactical Outlook ETF vs State Street Global Allocation ETF
Key differences
- GAL costs 1.16% less per year.
- GAL is significantly larger than RHTX — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- RHTX is classified as mixed asset, while GAL is alternative — different risk/return profiles.
- RHTX follows a active selection strategy; GAL uses tactical allocation.
- Over the last 3 years, RHTX has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| RHTX | GAL | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 1.51% | 0.35% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $9M | $307M |
| Since | 2012 | 2012 |
| Dividend yield | 0.00% | 3.18% |
| Asset class | mixed asset | alternative |
| Region | global | — |
| Strategy | active selection | tactical allocation |
| CAGR 1Y | +26.2% | +20.4% |
| CAGR 3Y | +16.1% | +13.9% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +7.2% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.81 | 1.04 |
| Volatility 1Y | 15.10% | 8.71% |
| Max drawdown | -24.68% | -28.31% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to RHTX and GAL
Explore further