Screener
RIFR vs AIQ
Russell Investments Global Infrastructure ETF vs Global X Artificial Intelligence & Technology ETF
Key differences
- RIFR costs 0.09% less per year.
- AIQ is significantly larger than RIFR — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- RIFR covers global markets; AIQ covers north america.
- RIFR follows a active selection strategy; AIQ uses index tracking.
- AIQ has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| RIFR | AIQ | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.59% | 0.68% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $42M | $8.6B |
| Since | 2025 | 2018 |
| Dividend yield | — | 0.17% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | global | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +16.0% | +56.5% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +36.9% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +18.0% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 1.33 |
| Volatility 1Y | 10.46% | 22.54% |
| Max drawdown | -6.80% | -44.66% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to RIFR and AIQ
Explore further