Screener
RIFR vs BKCH
Russell Investments Global Infrastructure ETF vs Global X Blockchain ETF
Key differences
- BKCH costs 0.09% less per year.
- BKCH is significantly larger than RIFR — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- RIFR covers global markets; BKCH covers north america.
- RIFR follows a active selection strategy; BKCH uses index tracking.
Side-by-side comparison
| RIFR | BKCH | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.59% | 0.50% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $42M | $314M |
| Since | 2025 | 2021 |
| Dividend yield | — | 1.73% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | global | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +16.1% | +108.0% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +61.1% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.96 |
| Volatility 1Y | 10.40% | 70.40% |
| Max drawdown | -6.80% | -91.80% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to RIFR and BKCH
Explore further