Screener
RIFR vs HECO
Russell Investments Global Infrastructure ETF vs State Street Galaxy Hedged Digital Asset Ecosystem ETF
Key differences
RIFR is an equity ETF, while HECO is an alternative ETF. RIFR charges 0.59% a year and HECO 0.90%.
- RIFR is an equity fund, while HECO is an alternative fund. They carry different risk/return profiles.
- RIFR follows a active selection strategy; HECO uses option income.
- RIFR covers global markets; HECO covers North America.
- RIFR costs 0.31% less per year.
Side-by-side comparison
| RIFR | HECO | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.59% | 0.90% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $41M | $116M |
| Since | 2025 | 2024 |
| Dividend yield | 0.89% | 0.00% |
| Asset class | equity | alternative |
| Region | global | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | option income |
| CAGR 1Y | +15.0% | +117.9% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 10.53% | 37.71% |
| Max drawdown | -6.80% | -43.74% |
Similar to RIFR and HECO
Explore further