Screener
RING vs AGMI
iShares MSCI Global Gold Miners ETF vs Themes Silver Miners ETF
Key differences
- RING is significantly larger than AGMI — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- RING has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| RING | AGMI | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.39% | 0.35% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $2.9B | $13M |
| Since | 2012 | 2024 |
| Dividend yield | 0.80% | 4.15% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | — | — |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +80.5% | +125.0% |
| CAGR 3Y | +45.2% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | +19.4% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.09 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 45.82% | 48.56% |
| Max drawdown | -52.04% | -33.26% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to RING and AGMI
Explore further