Screener
RING vs GOAU
iShares MSCI Global Gold Miners ETF vs U.S. Global GO GOLD and Precious Metal Miners ETF
Key differences
- RING costs 0.21% less per year.
- RING is significantly larger than GOAU — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- RING follows a index tracking strategy; GOAU uses active selection.
- Over the last 3 years, RING has delivered higher annualized returns.
- RING has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| RING | GOAU | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.39% | 0.60% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $2.9B | $187M |
| Since | 2012 | 2017 |
| Dividend yield | 0.80% | 0.95% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | — | global |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +80.5% | +48.2% |
| CAGR 3Y | +45.2% | +31.8% |
| CAGR 5Y | +19.4% | +14.9% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.09 | 0.83 |
| Volatility 1Y | 45.82% | 45.60% |
| Max drawdown | -52.04% | -55.41% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to RING and GOAU
Explore further