Screener
RING vs GDXJ
iShares MSCI Global Gold Miners ETF vs VanEck Junior Gold Miners ETF
Key differences
- RING costs 0.13% less per year.
- GDXJ is significantly larger than RING — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
Side-by-side comparison
| RING | GDXJ | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.39% | 0.52% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $2.9B | $8.7B |
| Since | 2012 | 2009 |
| Dividend yield | 0.80% | 2.27% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | — | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +80.5% | +80.7% |
| CAGR 3Y | +45.2% | +44.7% |
| CAGR 5Y | +19.4% | +17.6% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.09 | 1.02 |
| Volatility 1Y | 45.82% | 49.42% |
| Max drawdown | -52.04% | -57.78% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to RING and GDXJ
Explore further