Screener
RING vs INTL
iShares MSCI Global Gold Miners ETF vs Main International ETF
Key differences
- RING costs 0.45% less per year.
- RING is significantly larger than INTL — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- RING is classified as equity, while INTL is alternative — different risk/return profiles.
- RING follows a index tracking strategy; INTL uses option income.
- Over the last 3 years, RING has delivered higher annualized returns.
- RING has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| RING | INTL | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.39% | 0.84% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $2.9B | $222M |
| Since | 2012 | 2022 |
| Dividend yield | 0.80% | 2.37% |
| Asset class | equity | alternative |
| Region | — | global |
| Strategy | index tracking | option income |
| CAGR 1Y | +77.4% | +28.6% |
| CAGR 3Y | +46.5% | +17.2% |
| CAGR 5Y | +19.8% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.11 | 0.87 |
| Volatility 1Y | 46.02% | 15.35% |
| Max drawdown | -52.04% | -14.48% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to RING and INTL
Explore further