Screener
RISN vs RULE
Inspire Capital Appreciation ETF vs Adaptive Core ETF
Key differences
- RISN costs 1.12% less per year.
- RISN is significantly larger than RULE — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last 3 years, RULE has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| RISN | RULE | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.72% | 1.84% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $85M | $14M |
| Since | 2020 | 2021 |
| Dividend yield | 1.06% | 0.00% |
| Asset class | mixed asset | mixed asset |
| Region | north america | — |
| Strategy | active selection | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +15.8% | +47.4% |
| CAGR 3Y | +11.4% | +18.2% |
| CAGR 5Y | +5.0% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.63 | 0.87 |
| Volatility 1Y | 12.03% | 20.08% |
| Max drawdown | -21.88% | -30.48% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to RISN and RULE
Explore further