Screener
RULE vs TUG
Adaptive Core ETF vs STF Tactical Growth ETF
Key differences
- TUG costs 1.19% less per year.
- TUG is significantly larger than RULE — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last 3 years, TUG has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| RULE | TUG | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 1.84% | 0.65% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $14M | $42M |
| Since | 2021 | 2022 |
| Dividend yield | 0.00% | 0.58% |
| Asset class | mixed asset | mixed asset |
| Region | — | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +47.4% | +41.8% |
| CAGR 3Y | +18.2% | +24.6% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.87 | 1.06 |
| Volatility 1Y | 20.08% | 16.24% |
| Max drawdown | -30.48% | -22.27% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to RULE and TUG
Explore further