Screener
RLY vs FISR
State Street Multi-Asset Real Return ETF vs State Street Fixed Income Sector Rotation ETF
Key differences
- RLY is classified as mixed asset, while FISR is fixed income — different risk/return profiles.
- RLY follows a active selection strategy; FISR uses index tracking.
- Over the last 3 years, RLY has delivered higher annualized returns.
- RLY has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| RLY | FISR | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.50% | 0.50% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $1.2B | $514M |
| Since | 2012 | 2019 |
| Dividend yield | 2.84% | 4.11% |
| Asset class | mixed asset | fixed income |
| Region | — | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +33.0% | +5.5% |
| CAGR 3Y | +14.7% | +3.0% |
| CAGR 5Y | +10.7% | -0.7% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.95 | -0.06 |
| Volatility 1Y | 10.12% | 4.41% |
| Max drawdown | -34.17% | -20.27% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to RLY and FISR
Explore further