Screener
RLY vs RULE
State Street Multi-Asset Real Return ETF vs Adaptive Core ETF
Key differences
- RLY costs 1.34% less per year.
- RLY is significantly larger than RULE — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last 3 years, RULE has delivered higher annualized returns.
- RLY has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| RLY | RULE | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.50% | 1.84% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $1.2B | $14M |
| Since | 2012 | 2021 |
| Dividend yield | 2.84% | 0.00% |
| Asset class | mixed asset | mixed asset |
| Region | — | — |
| Strategy | active selection | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +33.0% | +41.5% |
| CAGR 3Y | +14.7% | +16.7% |
| CAGR 5Y | +10.7% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.95 | 0.81 |
| Volatility 1Y | 10.12% | 19.69% |
| Max drawdown | -34.17% | -30.48% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to RLY and RULE
Explore further