Screener
RLY vs XFLX
State Street Multi-Asset Real Return ETF vs FundX Flexible ETF
Key differences
- RLY costs 0.47% less per year.
- RLY is significantly larger than XFLX — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- RLY is classified as mixed asset, while XFLX is fixed income — different risk/return profiles.
- XFLX has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| RLY | XFLX | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.50% | 0.97% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $1.2B | $49M |
| Since | 2012 | 2002 |
| Dividend yield | 2.84% | 9.73% |
| Asset class | mixed asset | fixed income |
| Region | — | — |
| Strategy | active selection | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +31.7% | +5.3% |
| CAGR 3Y | +14.5% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | +11.0% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.94 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 10.08% | 3.53% |
| Max drawdown | -34.17% | -6.54% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to RLY and XFLX
Explore further