Screener
XFLX vs GAL
FundX Flexible ETF vs State Street Global Allocation ETF
Key differences
- GAL costs 0.62% less per year.
- GAL is significantly larger than XFLX — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- XFLX is classified as fixed income, while GAL is alternative — different risk/return profiles.
- XFLX follows a active selection strategy; GAL uses tactical allocation.
- XFLX has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| XFLX | GAL | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.97% | 0.35% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $49M | $307M |
| Since | 2002 | 2012 |
| Dividend yield | 9.73% | 3.18% |
| Asset class | fixed income | alternative |
| Region | — | — |
| Strategy | active selection | tactical allocation |
| CAGR 1Y | +5.3% | +21.1% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +14.1% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +7.5% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 1.06 |
| Volatility 1Y | 3.53% | 8.75% |
| Max drawdown | -6.54% | -28.31% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to XFLX and GAL
Explore further