Screener
RMIF vs PGF
LHA Risk-Managed Income ETF vs Invesco Financial Preferred ETF
Key differences
Both RMIF and PGF are fixed income ETFs. RMIF charges 1.55% a year and PGF 0.55%. The main difference: RMIF follows a active selection strategy; PGF uses index tracking.
- RMIF follows a active selection strategy; PGF uses index tracking.
- PGF costs 1.00% less per year.
- PGF is much larger than RMIF. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
- PGF has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| RMIF | PGF | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 1.55% | 0.55% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $26M | $699M |
| Since | 2023 | 2006 |
| Dividend yield | 5.29% | 6.29% |
| Asset class | fixed income | fixed income |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +3.0% | +3.8% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +4.2% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | -0.8% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.11 |
| Volatility 1Y | 2.65% | 6.26% |
| Max drawdown | -3.01% | -28.92% |
Beyond the comparison: Beacon helps you build, track, and project a portfolio with the ETFs you pick.