Screener
RNEM vs MEM
First Trust Emerging Markets Equity Select ETF vs Matthews Emerging Markets Equity Active ETF
Key differences
- MEM is significantly larger than RNEM — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- RNEM follows a index tracking strategy; MEM uses active selection.
- Over the last 3 years, MEM has delivered higher annualized returns.
- RNEM has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| RNEM | MEM | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.76% | 0.79% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $17M | $53M |
| Since | 2017 | 2022 |
| Dividend yield | 2.72% | 3.06% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | — | — |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +2.4% | +52.4% |
| CAGR 3Y | +8.2% | +23.2% |
| CAGR 5Y | +4.8% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.38 | 1.04 |
| Volatility 1Y | 13.35% | 20.59% |
| Max drawdown | -38.37% | -19.10% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to RNEM and MEM
Explore further