Skip to content
Beacon
Screener

RNRG vs PBW

Global X Renewable Energy Producers ETF vs Invesco WilderHill Clean Energy ETF

RNRG

Global X Renewable Energy Producers ETF

Global X Funds

Annual cost

0.65%

Fund size

$31M

PBW

Invesco WilderHill Clean Energy ETF

Invesco

Annual cost

0.64%

Fund size

$447M

Key differences

  • PBW is significantly larger than RNRG — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
  • RNRG covers global markets; PBW covers north america.
  • Over the last 3 years, PBW has delivered higher annualized returns.
  • PBW has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.

Side-by-side comparison

RNRGPBW
Annual cost (TER)0.65%0.64%
Fund size (AUM)$31M$447M
Since20152005
Dividend yield1.29%0.71%
Asset classequityequity
Regionglobalnorth america
Strategyindex trackingindex tracking
CAGR 1Y+39.9%+150.5%
CAGR 3Y+2.9%+7.2%
CAGR 5Y-2.3%-8.6%
Sharpe 3Y0.060.29
Volatility 1Y15.69%40.29%
Max drawdown-58.79%-89.06%

Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.

Similar to RNRG and PBW