Screener
ROAM vs JHMD
Hartford Multifactor Emerging Markets ETF vs John Hancock Multifactor Developed International ETF
Key differences
- JHMD is significantly larger than ROAM — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- ROAM follows a index tracking strategy; JHMD uses index enhanced.
- Over the last 3 years, ROAM has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| ROAM | JHMD | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.44% | 0.39% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $106M | $925M |
| Since | 2015 | 2016 |
| Dividend yield | 2.74% | 2.99% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | emerging markets | — |
| Strategy | index tracking | index enhanced |
| CAGR 1Y | +45.2% | +23.4% |
| CAGR 3Y | +24.5% | +16.6% |
| CAGR 5Y | +12.7% | +9.2% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.33 | 0.86 |
| Volatility 1Y | 14.41% | 14.77% |
| Max drawdown | -45.46% | -35.67% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to ROAM and JHMD
Explore further