Screener
ROBO vs IBOT
Robo Global Robotics and Automation Index ETF vs Vaneck Robotics ETF
Key differences
- IBOT costs 0.48% less per year.
- ROBO is significantly larger than IBOT — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- ROBO follows a active selection strategy; IBOT uses index tracking.
- Over the last 3 years, IBOT has delivered higher annualized returns.
- ROBO has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| ROBO | IBOT | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.95% | 0.47% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $1.8B | $71M |
| Since | 2013 | 2023 |
| Dividend yield | 0.36% | 0.32% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | global | — |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +57.1% | +56.3% |
| CAGR 3Y | +17.9% | +25.0% |
| CAGR 5Y | +7.7% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.69 | 0.95 |
| Volatility 1Y | 22.95% | 21.95% |
| Max drawdown | -43.65% | -25.39% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to ROBO and IBOT
Explore further