Screener
RODM vs DEEF
Hartford Multifactor Developed Markets (ex-US) ETF vs Xtrackers FTSE Developed ex US Multifactor ETF
Key differences
- RODM is significantly larger than DEEF — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last 3 years, RODM has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| RODM | DEEF | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.29% | 0.24% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $1.5B | $55M |
| Since | 2015 | 2015 |
| Dividend yield | 2.81% | 3.39% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | global | global |
| Strategy | index enhanced | index enhanced |
| CAGR 1Y | +28.5% | +25.7% |
| CAGR 3Y | +20.2% | +17.3% |
| CAGR 5Y | +10.2% | +8.2% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.29 | 0.97 |
| Volatility 1Y | 10.77% | 13.59% |
| Max drawdown | -35.98% | -36.47% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to RODM and DEEF
Explore further