Screener
ROE vs SQLT
Astoria US Equal Weight Quality Kings ETF vs Ishares MSCI USA Small-Cap Quality Factor ETF
Key differences
- SQLT costs 0.29% less per year.
- ROE is significantly larger than SQLT — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- ROE follows a active selection strategy; SQLT uses index tracking.
Side-by-side comparison
| ROE | SQLT | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.49% | 0.20% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $239M | $7M |
| Since | 2023 | 2026 |
| Dividend yield | 1.01% | — |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +37.5% | N/A |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 14.02% | — |
| Max drawdown | -19.10% | -3.95% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to ROE and SQLT
Explore further