Screener
ROM vs SMN
ProShares Ultra Technology vs ProShares UltraShort Materials
Key differences
Both ROM and SMN are equity ETFs. ROM charges 0.95% a year and SMN 0.95%. The main difference: ROM follows a leveraged strategy; SMN uses inverse.
- ROM follows a leveraged strategy; SMN uses inverse.
- ROM is much larger than SMN. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last three years, ROM has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| ROM | SMN | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.95% | 0.95% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $1.4B | $3M |
| Since | 2007 | 2007 |
| Dividend yield | 0.14% | 4.53% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | leveraged | inverse |
| CAGR 1Y | +114.2% | -30.4% |
| CAGR 3Y | +54.7% | -16.8% |
| CAGR 5Y | +28.0% | -15.2% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.07 | -0.46 |
| Volatility 1Y | 45.31% | 35.13% |
| Max drawdown | -67.55% | -95.39% |
Beyond the comparison: Beacon helps you build, track, and project a portfolio with the ETFs you pick.