Screener
SMN vs UYM
ProShares UltraShort Materials vs ProShares Ultra Materials
Key differences
- UYM is significantly larger than SMN — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- SMN follows a inverse strategy; UYM uses leveraged.
- Over the last 3 years, UYM has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| SMN | UYM | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.95% | 0.95% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $3M | $41M |
| Since | 2007 | 2007 |
| Dividend yield | 4.58% | 1.21% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | inverse | leveraged |
| CAGR 1Y | -31.2% | +35.7% |
| CAGR 3Y | -16.8% | +12.6% |
| CAGR 5Y | -14.9% | +3.9% |
| Sharpe 3Y | -0.46 | 0.41 |
| Volatility 1Y | 34.14% | 33.86% |
| Max drawdown | -95.39% | -73.31% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to SMN and UYM
Explore further