Screener
RPG vs CGGG
Invesco S&P 500 Pure Growth ETF vs Capital Group U.S. Large Growth ETF
Key differences
- RPG is significantly larger than CGGG — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- RPG has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| RPG | CGGG | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.35% | 0.39% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $1.8B | $78M |
| Since | 2006 | 2025 |
| Dividend yield | 0.19% | — |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +36.1% | N/A |
| CAGR 3Y | +26.0% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | +12.6% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.02 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 19.62% | — |
| Max drawdown | -36.58% | -17.74% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to RPG and CGGG
Explore further