Screener
RPG vs PFM
Invesco S&P 500 Pure Growth ETF vs Invesco Dividend Achievers ETF
Key differences
- RPG costs 0.17% less per year.
- Over the last 3 years, RPG has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| RPG | PFM | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.35% | 0.52% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $1.8B | $764M |
| Since | 2006 | 2005 |
| Dividend yield | 0.19% | 1.37% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +39.9% | +22.0% |
| CAGR 3Y | +26.6% | +16.2% |
| CAGR 5Y | +13.1% | +10.8% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.04 | 1.03 |
| Volatility 1Y | 19.79% | 9.62% |
| Max drawdown | -36.58% | -32.21% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to RPG and PFM
Explore further