Screener
RPHS vs CCOR
Regents Park Hedged Market Strategy ETF vs Core Alternative ETF
Key differences
Both RPHS and CCOR are alternative ETFs. RPHS charges 0.75% a year and CCOR 1.29%. The main difference: RPHS follows a active selection strategy; CCOR uses option income.
- RPHS follows a active selection strategy; CCOR uses option income.
- RPHS costs 0.54% less per year.
- Over the last three years, RPHS has delivered higher annualized returns.
- CCOR has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| RPHS | CCOR | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.75% | 1.29% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $56M | $27M |
| Since | 2022 | 2017 |
| Dividend yield | 2.76% | 1.10% |
| Asset class | alternative | alternative |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | option income |
| CAGR 1Y | +16.5% | -3.9% |
| CAGR 3Y | +14.4% | -1.5% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | -2.1% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.94 | -0.46 |
| Volatility 1Y | 10.73% | 7.22% |
| Max drawdown | -15.77% | -22.99% |
Beyond the comparison: Beacon helps you build, track, and project a portfolio with the ETFs you pick.