Screener
RPHS vs CSM
Regents Park Hedged Market Strategy ETF vs ProShares Large Cap Core Plus
Key differences
Both RPHS and CSM are alternative ETFs. RPHS charges 0.75% a year and CSM 0.45%. The main difference: CSM costs 0.30% less per year.
- CSM costs 0.30% less per year.
- CSM is much larger than RPHS. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last three years, CSM has delivered higher annualized returns.
- CSM has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| RPHS | CSM | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.75% | 0.45% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $56M | $524M |
| Since | 2022 | 2009 |
| Dividend yield | 2.76% | 1.00% |
| Asset class | alternative | alternative |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +15.5% | +23.0% |
| CAGR 3Y | +14.2% | +20.7% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +12.8% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.92 | 1.07 |
| Volatility 1Y | 10.71% | 12.19% |
| Max drawdown | -15.77% | -36.11% |
Beyond the comparison: Beacon helps you build, track, and project a portfolio with the ETFs you pick.