Screener
RPV vs CZA
Invesco S&P 500 Pure Value ETF vs Invesco Zacks Mid-Cap ETF
Key differences
- RPV costs 0.34% less per year.
- RPV is significantly larger than CZA — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last 3 years, RPV has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| RPV | CZA | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.35% | 0.69% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $1.8B | $184M |
| Since | 2006 | 2007 |
| Dividend yield | 2.29% | 1.47% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +29.3% | +14.6% |
| CAGR 3Y | +19.8% | +14.2% |
| CAGR 5Y | +9.7% | +6.9% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.02 | 0.73 |
| Volatility 1Y | 12.58% | 12.79% |
| Max drawdown | -50.67% | -46.18% |
Similar to RPV and CZA
Explore further