Screener
RSP vs OMFL
Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF vs Invesco Russell 1000 Dynamic Multifactor ETF
Key differences
- RSP costs 0.09% less per year.
- RSP is significantly larger than OMFL — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- RSP is classified as equity, while OMFL is alternative — different risk/return profiles.
- RSP follows a index enhanced strategy; OMFL uses systematic alpha.
- RSP has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| RSP | OMFL | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.20% | 0.29% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $86.4B | $4.6B |
| Since | 2003 | 2017 |
| Dividend yield | 1.53% | 0.78% |
| Asset class | equity | alternative |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index enhanced | systematic alpha |
| CAGR 1Y | +19.6% | +23.5% |
| CAGR 3Y | +15.2% | +14.3% |
| CAGR 5Y | +8.4% | +9.4% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.83 | 0.74 |
| Volatility 1Y | 11.73% | 12.16% |
| Max drawdown | -39.04% | -33.24% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to RSP and OMFL
Explore further