Skip to content
Beacon
Screener

RSPA vs VRP

Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Income Advantage ETF vs Invesco Variable Rate Preferred ETF

RSPA

Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Income Advantage ETF

Annual cost

0.29%

Fund size

$859M

VRP

Invesco Variable Rate Preferred ETF

Annual cost

0.50%

Fund size

$2.9B

Key differences

RSPA is an alternative ETF, while VRP is a fixed income ETF. RSPA charges 0.29% a year and VRP 0.50%.

  • RSPA is an alternative fund, while VRP is a fixed income fund. They carry different risk/return profiles.
  • RSPA follows a option income strategy; VRP uses index tracking.
  • RSPA costs 0.21% less per year.
  • VRP is much larger than RSPA. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
  • VRP has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.

Side-by-side comparison

RSPAVRP
Annual cost (TER)0.29%0.50%
Fund size (AUM)$859M$2.9B
Since20242014
Dividend yield9.01%6.31%
Asset classalternativefixed income
Regionnorth americanorth america
Strategyoption incomeindex tracking
CAGR 1Y+17.7%+6.8%
CAGR 3YN/A+9.9%
CAGR 5YN/A+4.4%
Sharpe 3YN/A1.35
Volatility 1Y9.42%2.89%
Max drawdown-15.37%-46.04%

Similar to RSPA and VRP