Screener
RSPA vs PGF
Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Income Advantage ETF vs Invesco Financial Preferred ETF
Key differences
- RSPA costs 0.26% less per year.
- RSPA is classified as alternative, while PGF is fixed income — different risk/return profiles.
- RSPA follows a option income strategy; PGF uses index tracking.
- PGF has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| RSPA | PGF | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.29% | 0.55% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $859M | $699M |
| Since | 2024 | 2006 |
| Dividend yield | 9.01% | 6.29% |
| Asset class | alternative | fixed income |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | option income | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +17.7% | +3.7% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +4.8% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | -0.8% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.17 |
| Volatility 1Y | 9.42% | 6.26% |
| Max drawdown | -15.37% | -28.92% |
Similar to RSPA and PGF
Explore further