Screener
RSPA vs PGX
Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Income Advantage ETF vs Invesco Preferred ETF
Key differences
- RSPA costs 0.21% less per year.
- PGX is significantly larger than RSPA — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- RSPA is classified as alternative, while PGX is fixed income — different risk/return profiles.
- RSPA follows a option income strategy; PGX uses index tracking.
- PGX has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| RSPA | PGX | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.29% | 0.50% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $859M | $3.8B |
| Since | 2024 | 2008 |
| Dividend yield | 9.01% | 6.21% |
| Asset class | alternative | fixed income |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | option income | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +17.7% | +5.0% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +5.1% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | -0.7% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.20 |
| Volatility 1Y | 9.42% | 6.10% |
| Max drawdown | -15.37% | -34.10% |
Similar to RSPA and PGX
Explore further