Screener
RSPG vs RSP
Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Energy ETF vs Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF
Key differences
- RSP costs 0.20% less per year.
- RSP is significantly larger than RSPG — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- RSPG follows a index tracking strategy; RSP uses index enhanced.
- Over the last 3 years, RSPG has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| RSPG | RSP | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.40% | 0.20% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $624M | $86.4B |
| Since | 2006 | 2003 |
| Dividend yield | 1.89% | 1.53% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index enhanced |
| CAGR 1Y | +46.8% | +21.0% |
| CAGR 3Y | +19.2% | +15.1% |
| CAGR 5Y | +22.2% | +8.8% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.72 | 0.83 |
| Volatility 1Y | 21.70% | 11.72% |
| Max drawdown | -73.17% | -39.04% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to RSPG and RSP
Explore further