Screener
RSPH vs BBH
Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Health Care ETF vs VanEck Biotech ETF
Key differences
Both RSPH and BBH are equity ETFs. RSPH charges 0.40% a year and BBH 0.35%. The main difference: RSPH follows a index enhanced strategy; BBH uses index tracking.
- RSPH follows a index enhanced strategy; BBH uses index tracking.
- BBH costs 0.05% less per year.
- Over the last three years, BBH has delivered higher annualized returns.
- RSPH has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| RSPH | BBH | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.40% | 0.35% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $637M | $367M |
| Since | 2006 | 2011 |
| Dividend yield | 0.72% | 0.51% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index enhanced | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +11.7% | +21.9% |
| CAGR 3Y | +4.7% | +6.6% |
| CAGR 5Y | +3.2% | -0.2% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.14 | 0.25 |
| Volatility 1Y | 15.83% | 19.41% |
| Max drawdown | -30.44% | -39.86% |
Beyond the comparison: Beacon helps you build, track, and project a portfolio with the ETFs you pick.