Skip to content
Screener

RSPH vs PPH

Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Health Care ETF vs VanEck Pharmaceutical ETF

RSPH

Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Health Care ETF

Annual cost

0.40%

Fund size

$637M

PPH

VanEck Pharmaceutical ETF

Annual cost

0.36%

Fund size

$942M

Key differences

Both RSPH and PPH are equity ETFs. RSPH charges 0.40% a year and PPH 0.36%. The main difference: RSPH follows a index enhanced strategy; PPH uses index tracking.

  • RSPH follows a index enhanced strategy; PPH uses index tracking.
  • Over the last three years, PPH has delivered higher annualized returns.
  • RSPH has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.

Side-by-side comparison

RSPHPPH
Annual cost (TER)0.40%0.36%
Fund size (AUM)$637M$942M
Since20062011
Dividend yield0.72%2.06%
Asset classequityequity
Regionnorth americanorth america
Strategyindex enhancedindex tracking
CAGR 1Y+11.7%+20.4%
CAGR 3Y+4.7%+13.9%
CAGR 5Y+3.2%+10.1%
Sharpe 3Y0.140.69
Volatility 1Y15.83%17.68%
Max drawdown-30.44%-29.70%

Beyond the comparison: Beacon helps you build, track, and project a portfolio with the ETFs you pick.

See all growth funds

Similar to RSPH and PPH