Screener
See all growth funds
RSPH vs PJP
Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Health Care ETF vs Invesco Pharmaceuticals ETF
Key differences
Both RSPH and PJP are equity ETFs. RSPH charges 0.40% a year and PJP 0.57%. The main difference: RSPH follows a index enhanced strategy; PJP uses index tracking.
- RSPH follows a index enhanced strategy; PJP uses index tracking.
- RSPH costs 0.17% less per year.
- Over the last three years, PJP has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| RSPH | PJP | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.40% | 0.57% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $637M | $341M |
| Since | 2006 | 2005 |
| Dividend yield | 0.72% | 0.96% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index enhanced | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +11.7% | +40.8% |
| CAGR 3Y | +4.7% | +15.9% |
| CAGR 5Y | +3.2% | +8.4% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.14 | 0.79 |
| Volatility 1Y | 15.83% | 16.63% |
| Max drawdown | -30.44% | -33.95% |
Beyond the comparison: Beacon helps you build, track, and project a portfolio with the ETFs you pick.