Skip to content
Screener

RSPH vs PJP

Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Health Care ETF vs Invesco Pharmaceuticals ETF

RSPH

Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Health Care ETF

Annual cost

0.40%

Fund size

$637M

PJP

Invesco Pharmaceuticals ETF

Annual cost

0.57%

Fund size

$341M

Key differences

Both RSPH and PJP are equity ETFs. RSPH charges 0.40% a year and PJP 0.57%. The main difference: RSPH follows a index enhanced strategy; PJP uses index tracking.

  • RSPH follows a index enhanced strategy; PJP uses index tracking.
  • RSPH costs 0.17% less per year.
  • Over the last three years, PJP has delivered higher annualized returns.

Side-by-side comparison

RSPHPJP
Annual cost (TER)0.40%0.57%
Fund size (AUM)$637M$341M
Since20062005
Dividend yield0.72%0.96%
Asset classequityequity
Regionnorth americanorth america
Strategyindex enhancedindex tracking
CAGR 1Y+11.7%+40.8%
CAGR 3Y+4.7%+15.9%
CAGR 5Y+3.2%+8.4%
Sharpe 3Y0.140.79
Volatility 1Y15.83%16.63%
Max drawdown-30.44%-33.95%

Beyond the comparison: Beacon helps you build, track, and project a portfolio with the ETFs you pick.

See all growth funds

Similar to RSPH and PJP