Screener
RSPH vs EQWL
Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Health Care ETF vs Invesco S&P 100 Equal Weight ETF
Key differences
Both RSPH and EQWL are equity ETFs. RSPH charges 0.40% a year and EQWL 0.25%. The main difference: EQWL costs 0.15% less per year.
- EQWL costs 0.15% less per year.
- EQWL is much larger than RSPH. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last three years, EQWL has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| RSPH | EQWL | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.40% | 0.25% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $637M | $2.6B |
| Since | 2006 | 2006 |
| Dividend yield | 0.72% | 1.53% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index enhanced | index enhanced |
| CAGR 1Y | +11.7% | +21.1% |
| CAGR 3Y | +4.7% | +19.7% |
| CAGR 5Y | +3.2% | +11.7% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.14 | 1.17 |
| Volatility 1Y | 15.83% | 10.74% |
| Max drawdown | -30.44% | -34.30% |
Beyond the comparison: Beacon helps you build, track, and project a portfolio with the ETFs you pick.