Screener
RULE vs BSR
Adaptive Core ETF vs Pacific Select Fund
Key differences
- BSR costs 0.75% less per year.
- Over the last 3 years, RULE has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| RULE | BSR | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 1.84% | 1.09% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $14M | $39M |
| Since | 2021 | 2023 |
| Dividend yield | 0.00% | 1.02% |
| Asset class | mixed asset | mixed asset |
| Region | — | — |
| Strategy | active selection | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +41.5% | +12.5% |
| CAGR 3Y | +16.7% | +8.0% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.81 | 0.33 |
| Volatility 1Y | 19.69% | 8.71% |
| Max drawdown | -30.48% | -15.68% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to RULE and BSR
Explore further