Screener
RULE vs DFAX
Adaptive Core ETF vs Dimensional World ex U.S. Core Equity 2 ETF
Key differences
- DFAX costs 1.56% less per year.
- DFAX is significantly larger than RULE — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- RULE is classified as mixed asset, while DFAX is equity — different risk/return profiles.
- Over the last 3 years, DFAX has delivered higher annualized returns.
- DFAX has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| RULE | DFAX | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 1.84% | 0.28% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $14M | $11.5B |
| Since | 2021 | 2008 |
| Dividend yield | 0.00% | 2.30% |
| Asset class | mixed asset | equity |
| Region | — | — |
| Strategy | active selection | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +41.5% | +35.0% |
| CAGR 3Y | +16.7% | +20.3% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.81 | 1.09 |
| Volatility 1Y | 19.69% | 14.74% |
| Max drawdown | -30.48% | -28.15% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to RULE and DFAX
Explore further