Screener
RWK vs PGF
Invesco S&P MidCap 400 Revenue ETF vs Invesco Financial Preferred ETF
Key differences
- RWK costs 0.16% less per year.
- Over the last 3 years, RWK has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| RWK | PGF | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.39% | 0.55% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $1.2B | $719M |
| Since | 2008 | 2006 |
| Dividend yield | 1.16% | 6.24% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +28.8% | +6.0% |
| CAGR 3Y | +18.4% | +5.6% |
| CAGR 5Y | +10.7% | -0.4% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.80 | 0.25 |
| Volatility 1Y | 16.91% | 6.36% |
| Max drawdown | -46.20% | -28.92% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to RWK and PGF
Explore further