Screener
RWK vs QBIG
Invesco S&P MidCap 400 Revenue ETF vs Invesco Top QQQ ETF
Key differences
- QBIG costs 0.10% less per year.
- RWK is significantly larger than QBIG — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- RWK follows a index tracking strategy; QBIG uses active selection.
- RWK has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| RWK | QBIG | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.39% | 0.29% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $1.2B | $36M |
| Since | 2008 | 2024 |
| Dividend yield | 1.16% | 0.00% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +26.0% | +41.4% |
| CAGR 3Y | +17.5% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | +9.7% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.76 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 16.84% | 19.60% |
| Max drawdown | -46.20% | -30.33% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to RWK and QBIG
Explore further