Skip to content
Beacon
Screener

RWL vs GTOS

Invesco S&P 500 Revenue ETF vs Invesco Short Duration Total Return Bond ETF

RWL

Invesco S&P 500 Revenue ETF

Annual cost

0.39%

Fund size

$9.1B

GTOS

Invesco Short Duration Total Return Bond ETF

Annual cost

Fund size

Key differences

RWL is an equity ETF, while GTOS is a fixed income ETF.

  • RWL is an equity fund, while GTOS is a fixed income fund. They carry different risk/return profiles.
  • RWL follows a index tracking strategy; GTOS uses active selection.
  • Over the last three years, RWL has delivered higher annualized returns.

Side-by-side comparison

RWLGTOS
Annual cost (TER)0.39%
Fund size (AUM)$9.1B
Since2008
Dividend yield1.24%
Asset classequityfixed income
Regionnorth america
Strategyindex trackingactive selection
CAGR 1Y+27.5%+4.7%
CAGR 3Y+21.1%+5.6%
CAGR 5Y+13.1%N/A
Sharpe 3Y1.331.14
Volatility 1Y10.11%1.39%
Max drawdown-36.04%-1.44%

Similar to RWL and GTOS