Screener
RWL vs PGX
Invesco S&P 500 Revenue ETF vs Invesco Preferred ETF
Key differences
- RWL costs 0.11% less per year.
- RWL is classified as equity, while PGX is fixed income — different risk/return profiles.
- Over the last 3 years, RWL has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| RWL | PGX | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.39% | 0.50% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $8.8B | $3.9B |
| Since | 2008 | 2008 |
| Dividend yield | 1.28% | 6.16% |
| Asset class | equity | fixed income |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +29.1% | +7.3% |
| CAGR 3Y | +20.2% | +6.1% |
| CAGR 5Y | +13.3% | -0.3% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.28 | 0.31 |
| Volatility 1Y | 10.12% | 6.14% |
| Max drawdown | -36.04% | -34.10% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to RWL and PGX
Explore further