Screener
RWL vs IPKW
Invesco S&P 500 Revenue ETF vs Invesco International BuyBack Achievers ETF
Key differences
- RWL costs 0.16% less per year.
- RWL is significantly larger than IPKW — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- RWL covers north america markets; IPKW covers global.
- Over the last 3 years, IPKW has delivered higher annualized returns.
- RWL has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| RWL | IPKW | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.39% | 0.55% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $8.8B | $530M |
| Since | 2008 | 2014 |
| Dividend yield | 1.28% | 3.51% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | global |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +29.1% | +29.0% |
| CAGR 3Y | +20.2% | +24.3% |
| CAGR 5Y | +13.3% | +10.3% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.28 | 1.21 |
| Volatility 1Y | 10.12% | 14.37% |
| Max drawdown | -36.04% | -47.24% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to RWL and IPKW
Explore further