Screener
RWL vs OEF
Invesco S&P 500 Revenue ETF vs iShares S&P 100 ETF
Key differences
- OEF costs 0.19% less per year.
- Over the last 3 years, OEF has delivered higher annualized returns.
- OEF has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| RWL | OEF | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.39% | 0.20% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $8.8B | $19.6B |
| Since | 2008 | 2000 |
| Dividend yield | 1.28% | 0.88% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +27.9% | +31.9% |
| CAGR 3Y | +20.3% | +25.8% |
| CAGR 5Y | +12.9% | +15.9% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.28 | 1.31 |
| Volatility 1Y | 10.14% | 12.88% |
| Max drawdown | -36.04% | -31.44% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to RWL and OEF
Explore further