Screener
RWL vs QTJL
Invesco S&P 500 Revenue ETF vs Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - July
Key differences
- RWL costs 0.40% less per year.
- RWL is significantly larger than QTJL — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- RWL is classified as equity, while QTJL is alternative — different risk/return profiles.
- RWL follows a index tracking strategy; QTJL uses structured outcome.
- RWL has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| RWL | QTJL | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.39% | 0.79% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $8.8B | $27M |
| Since | 2008 | 2021 |
| Dividend yield | 1.28% | 0.00% |
| Asset class | equity | alternative |
| Region | north america | — |
| Strategy | index tracking | structured outcome |
| CAGR 1Y | +29.1% | +24.8% |
| CAGR 3Y | +20.2% | +19.5% |
| CAGR 5Y | +13.3% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.28 | 0.92 |
| Volatility 1Y | 10.12% | 10.26% |
| Max drawdown | -36.04% | -33.40% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to RWL and QTJL
Explore further