Screener
RWL vs XTJL
Invesco S&P 500 Revenue ETF vs Innovator U.S. Equity Accelerated Plus ETF - July
Key differences
- RWL costs 0.40% less per year.
- RWL is significantly larger than XTJL — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- RWL is classified as equity, while XTJL is alternative — different risk/return profiles.
- RWL follows a index tracking strategy; XTJL uses structured outcome.
- Over the last 3 years, RWL has delivered higher annualized returns.
- RWL has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| RWL | XTJL | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.39% | 0.79% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $8.8B | $21M |
| Since | 2008 | 2021 |
| Dividend yield | 1.28% | 0.00% |
| Asset class | equity | alternative |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | structured outcome |
| CAGR 1Y | +29.1% | +18.4% |
| CAGR 3Y | +20.2% | +15.3% |
| CAGR 5Y | +13.3% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.28 | 0.90 |
| Volatility 1Y | 10.12% | 7.64% |
| Max drawdown | -36.04% | -23.24% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to RWL and XTJL
Explore further