Screener
RWL vs RSPF
Invesco S&P 500 Revenue ETF vs Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Financials ETF
Key differences
- RWL is significantly larger than RSPF — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last 3 years, RWL has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| RWL | RSPF | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.39% | 0.40% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $8.8B | $274M |
| Since | 2008 | 2006 |
| Dividend yield | 1.28% | 1.66% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +29.1% | +6.3% |
| CAGR 3Y | +20.2% | +17.1% |
| CAGR 5Y | +13.3% | +6.2% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.28 | 0.81 |
| Volatility 1Y | 10.12% | 15.10% |
| Max drawdown | -36.04% | -44.80% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to RWL and RSPF
Explore further